What Memphis needs now is a balance of realism and optimism.
We should all feel upbeat about developments that have positioned Memphis positively in the last couple of years: the convergence of important national initiatives in Memphis, the fact that our MSA in 2010 had a larger increase in GDP than the Atlanta MSA, and that after a decade of shedding jobs by the tens of thousands, Memphis is on the plus side of the jobs ledger.
That said, we should resist the temptation to engage in the kind of cheerleading that 250,000 Memphians with low incomes find perplexing or that obscures the structural problems that has plagued Memphis for decades. Memphis Mayor A C Wharton walked this line in an interview on WKNO-FM’s Marketplace a few weeks ago, saying that there are signs of progress and momentum but that we have structural issues that demand attention and action over a sustained period of time.
Perhaps, hopefully, we have reached a tipping point and that we can now finally attack the tough structural problems in Memphis: a high poverty rate and its attendant web of problems, almost half of the people over 18 out of the job market, and long-standing low educational attainment levels.
We’ve written several times in recent months that as we begin the journey to where we want to be from where we are, we must be realistic enough to understand that it will require us to stay focused for several decades on the things that matter and to keep our focus and show patience to stay resolutely on task. Year after year.
Moving Past What We Want to Hear
Last week, the news media heralded that we have the highest poverty rate among the nation’s largest 51 MSAs. Of course, it’s not like this problem appeared overnight, but without New Orleans to kick around anymore, we have no one to keep us from being the very worse in a number of categories.
The one thing that the news media can do is to create a sense of urgency, and that was the case last week as some key leaders in the public and philanthropic sectors began to talk anew about a concerted attack on poverty. Hopefully, it was the wake-up call that we needed to get serious about tackling our toughest and most intractable problem.
We begin by being completely honest and by setting out an accurate context for our work. As a friend of ours is fond of saying: “In Memphis we pay people a lot of money to tell us what we want to hear.” Well, it’s past time to come face-to-face with the things we don’t want to hear.
Other cities are doing it. There’s the Greater Louisville Project which reports data and trend lines and points out factors, like density, that are crucial to the region’s economic success. There’s the East-West Gateway Council of Government’s Where We Stand – The Strategic Assessment of the St. Louis Region, which provides a clear context of the area’s competitive position when compared to 35 other major cities.
We’re #1
Both of the reports call it like they see it and focus on the factors and forces that have the power to improve their region’s trajectory. In particular, we always find the St. Louis report useful because Memphis is one of the 35 cities, and the report dramatically demonstrates our structural problems.
The 35 MSA’s in the Where We Stand report are Salt Lake City, Oklahoma City, Louisville, Milwaukee, Nashville, Austin, Indianapolis, Charlotte, Columbus, Kansas City, Cleveland, Cincinnati, San Antonio, Portland, Pittsburgh, Denver, Baltimore, St. Louis, San Diego, Minneapolis, Seattle, Phoenix, Detroit, San Francisco, Boston, Atlanta, Miami, Washington DC, Houston, Philadelphia, Dallas, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York City.
The results of our structural problems are clear in the categories in which we are #1:
# 1 – Families in poverty
# 1 – Families headed by single parents (37.3% and Miami is a distant #2 at 31.3%)
# 1 – Births to Teen Mothers (15% of all births)
# 1 – Unwed Parents (55.4%)
# 1 – Children Living in Poverty (30%)
# 1 – Individuals Living in Poverty (19.4%)
# 1 – Infant Mortality Rate (12.5 per 1,000 births and #2 is Cleveland at a distance 8.8%)
# 1 – Prevalence of Obesity
# 1 – Incidence of High Blood Pressure
Other Warning Signs
It also speaks to our highest priority and greatest challenge: to break the link here between race and poverty. We are also #1 in percentage of population that is African-American.
Several other rankings suggest the price that the Memphis MSA pays as the nation’s leader in poverty:
# 1 – Transportation Costs as percent of Median Household Income (27.1%)
# 2 – Housing/transportation costs as % of MHI income (55.4%)
# 6 – Homes with negative equity (28.5%)
#35 – Adults with advanced academic degrees (8.7%)
#34 – Adults with bachelor’s degree (15.5%)
#34 – Children enrolled in preschool (17.4%)
#35 – Median Household Income ($43,633)
#31 – Metro area density
Sooner Rather Than Later
There are a few faint silver linings in the dark clouds. First, we talk a lot about finding regional solutions and regional plans of action here, and Memphis is #2 in one category: the largest city’s share of the region’s population. Memphis is about half of the region’s population and when you include Shelby County, it’s about 75%, meaning that if we can adopt countywide policies and programs with organizations like EDGE, we will have taken a big step toward regionalism.
Another positive relates to our region’s low cost of living. Although we are #31 in earnings per job ($43,204), when it is adjusted for cost of living in each MSA, we move all the way up to #10 ($49,151).
The journey to a more prosperous and equitable Memphis will be long and difficult, but there’s no time like the present. The sooner we begin the sooner we can see progress.
Some historical info on poverty here:
The 1980 Census showed the Memphis area ranking first in poverty among the nation’s large metro areas. The area was third in both 1990 (behind New Orleans and San Antonio) and 2000 (behind New Orleans and Los Angeles). So for at least the last 30 years, the Memphis area has been at or near the top in poverty.
Other info: The 2010 ACS data may not be entirely comparable with the 1980, 1990 and 2000 data. The 2010 regular Census differed significantly from previous censuses. During the past decade, the Census Bureau put in place its American Community Survey, which collects income, education and some other information annually which previously were a part of the regular 10 year census. Most of the items that were put under the ACS were taken out of the regular census. . There is no income or poverty information in the 2010 Census results.
One of the reasons for ACS is that a lot of this data is needed annually for federal programs and some other things rather than only on a once-every-ten years basis.
Another thing that might provide further confusion is that there are now three ACS releases annually. One is the one-year data, which were released recently and include only those areas of 65,000 population or more; the second is the three-year ACS, which combines information over three years and includes areas down to about 25,000 and the third is the five-year ACS, which combines information over five years, and includes even smaller areas. Since they are based on more survey data, the three-year ACS data is considered more reliable than the one-year data, and the five-year ACS is considered more reliable than the three-year ACS.
Yes, a focus on Shelby county seems to be the upper level of regionalism here, but Memphis/Shelby needs to exert more influence over the MPO’s long range transportation planning now called “Direction 2040” (Do we know what happened to “Imagine 2035”?).
Also, Memphis/Shelby should be concerned about “DeSoto New Era of Discovery: A Stewardship Plan” being prepared now (desotodiscovery.com). This plan will fuel lower density for metro area and diminish Shelby’s share of jobs and people in metro area.
Maybe the recognition of Shelby’s diminished share of the metropolitan economy, will bring Germantown, Collierville, Bartlett, Millington, & Arlington into a real partnership with Memphis?
partnership with MEMPHIS ?? LOL are you nuts ? sorry, that ain’t happening with Germantown “partner-ing” with just about anything with The City of Memphis !
These people are too busy running away from Memphis, IF you haven’t noticed in the LAST 20 good years !
some people in Memphis must be in DreamLand, or in denial about what the true attitudes are inside the region, and waaaay outside the region and the State !!
when people in the SE and in most of the US think of progressive, great places to live, Memphis does NOT come into their minds immediately, SURELY you must know that ?? LOL come’on !
As usual, you’re not even close to being on topic, and so, we’ll just ignore the sidetrack comments.