Smart City Memphis
 

Sign up or Login

Getting the Melody Right for the Creative Economy

by Smart City Memphis (RSS) | September 9th, 2010 12:19am CDT

Tweet

We seem unable to shake off one of our most serious examples of civic lethargy:  our tendency to take our most famous international export for granted as we talk about attracting and keeping creative workers – music.

Meanwhile, the rich get richer.

Up I-40, Nashville Mayor Karl Dean continues to drive new thinking about his city’s music industry, even to the point of gutsily suggesting that perhaps the county vibe was turning off creative types that the city needs.   In response, he appointed the Nashville Music Council, a group of 50 high-profile musicians and industry leaders, with the audacious goal of making Nashville “the friendliest, most supportive city in America for creatives.”

One of Mayor Dean’s goals was even more heretical: to expand the annual CMA Music Festival to include genres other than country.  Some of the other recommendations sound eerily like they may have been borrowed from Memphis Music Foundation, but on balance, the show of solidarity and focus on creative workers using music were impressive.  After all, most of the music business centers on creative work such as writing, producing, performing, designing, and marketing, and it breeds the chemistry and connectivity that offers lessons for the creative economy at large.

The Largest 15 Music Cities

Of course, Nashville is the 800-pound gorilla.  It has the highest concentration of the music industry in the U.S. and Canada and it is more than three times bigger than the second place city, Los Angeles.  The 15 cities in U.S. and Canada with the highest music industry location quotients are:

1)      Nashville

2)      Los Angeles

3)      Montreal

4)      Toronto

5)      Vancouver

6)      New York

7)      Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA

8)      Madison, WI

9)      Atlanta

10)  Quebec City

11)  Winnipeg

12)  Austin

13)  Ottawa-Gatineau

14)  Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT

15)  San Francisco

Creative industries in the U.S. like music tend to be driven by clustering and economies of scale and scope.  One of the most important themes of new thinking about creative cities centers on authenticity, which is elemental to the character of our city but like music gets more lip service than action.

An Edge Strategy

As our colleague Carol Coletta has written, “Creative capital – new ideas and innovations, new designs, new ways of working and playing – is the fuel for the 21st century economic engine.”  It’s the availability of talented people who are the keys to success in this economy, not raw materials or access to markets.

There are defining characteristics in a cultural scene that can make it attractive to creative workers: boundary crossing, definitions of culture and the promotion of inter-connections.  That’s because there is multi-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary artistic and cultural expression; informal arts activities like public art, street festivals, gallery walks and farmers’ markets; cross-pollination between for-profit and nonprofit with people active on both sides of the street; and routine request for creative workers to be on task forces.

Our city has a way to go with better representation of young professionals and creatives on boards and planning task forces.  There were some promising signs with the large committee considering the future of Beale Street as some folks from “the edge” and people not often seen on these types of public groups were mixed into the usual suspects.

It’s worth remembering the admonition of John Seeley Brown when he spoke to Leadership Memphis several years ago: “Innovation always comes from the edge.  If you want innovation, don’t look to the center.  That’s where you find conventional thinking and people invested in things as they are.”

Place Matters

That’s certainly been the case with the entrepreneurial and musical history of Memphis but somehow over the years, we lost sight of the reality of innovation.  We’ve even rewritten our history to suggest that we embraced our famous music performers and recognized their genius from the beginning.

That’s the thing about creatives.  It’s not just that we need them for our city to thrive economically.  We need them to shake up the status quo, to provide new thinking and to shake off the vestiges of the ways things have always been.

Fundamentally, however, we must build a creative place.  We should promote adaptive reuse of buildings to house creative companies; we should take culture to the streets and turn arts programming inside out; we should develop districts and neighborhoods that are Cultural Empowerment Zones with incentives and sweat equity options; we should develop design and development guidelines to encourage creativity and leverage the distinctiveness of neighborhoods; and more.

We have to push ahead until we find the tipping point, the point at which the rhetoric about young professionals, entrepreneurs and creative workers is transformed into solid, actionable things we can do.  We seem to have become experts at incorporating the vocabulary of new ideas, but without changing our behavior.

Getting the Outsiders In

The damage from this is even greater than it would be in most cities, because in a city that prides itself for its authenticity, it’s the inauthentic behavior of rhetoric over results that discourages the very people we’re trying to enlist and encourage and the creative ecosystem that we are desperate for.

In Cities in Civilization, Peter Hall writes for 1,168 pages about how particular cities suddenly become exceptionally creative and innovative. He said some urban centers flourish, decline and reawaken periodically. He concentrates on about 20 cities from the Golden Age of Greek civilization to London’s glory days of capitalism in the 1980’s.

One of the featured cities is Memphis from 1948 to 1956. Calling our city “the soul of the Delta,” he writes about the collision of musical styles that produced rock and roll and transformed American music forever. He makes the case that Memphis’ burst of creative genius resulted from the combination of advances in technology, the rise of independent record labels and the impact of “outsiders.”

We tend to see all of this creativity as just a chapter in our history and we see it largely through a rearview mirror.  The truth is that it has lessons just as potent for us today, beginning with seeing music as a vehicle to our creative economy.

Tags: creativity, Memphis Music

Categories: Uncategorized

Comments RSS Feed

9 Comments

  1. Dean Deyo says:
    September 9, 2010 at 2:37 pm

    Great analysis and you are exactly right – but give Memphis some credit. It is not surprising that some of Nashville’s “ideas” sound like they were Made in Memphis – they were. Nashville has become very interested in what is happening with Memphis Music. In fact, in their recent press articles they were “insulted” that the Memphis community should declare that “MEMPHIS MEANS MUSIC”……that anyone would dare to attack their MUSIC CITY title. We are getting our eyes out of the rear view mirror and have them planted squarely on the road ahead.

    Dean Deyo
    President – Memphis Music Foundation

  2. Christopher Reyes says:
    September 9, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    There is so much lip service about building industry, attracting and retaining talent. Yet when there is money available it is usually sunk into a political backed non-profit vs. the industry. Typically the people who run these organizations have little to no experience. They bumble along wasting money and resources and dance when they are expected to.

    Change in the INDUSTRY will come when you stop GIVING the money to people who are looking for ways to spend it and start SPENDING it with the people who who’s goals are to make more of it.

    Don’t get me wrong many non-profits do great things but then again sometimes they are just bloated bureaucrats stuffing their faces with salaries they don’t earn.

  3. Stan J. says:
    September 9, 2010 at 11:24 pm

    Are we really supposed to believe that Nashville is looking over its shoulder at Memphis or giving the Music Foundation a second thought. We weren’t even on the list and they were #1. Get real.

  4. Finegold Hasava says:
    September 10, 2010 at 4:08 am

    What does the Mayor of Davidson County feel about these bold moves by the Mayor of Nashville? Are they cooperating? Is the Nashville Music Council a joint organization? Memphis and Shelby County would at least have meetings on such a bold move and appoint a joint study committee so our two Mayors could get on with the business of “governing”.

  5. Scott Banbury says:
    September 10, 2010 at 7:38 am

    I second Christopher’s thoughts regarding our investments but also want to point out that serious music aficionados do recognize Memphis’ preeminence in musical creativity, the quality of which is directly proportionate to the economic depression and social repression from which it stems. Catch 22?

  6. Jaclyn Suffel says:
    September 11, 2010 at 6:16 pm

    You know I definitely appreciate this sentiment (even though you did sadly not give a shout out to the theatre scene)and completely agree that creative capital is what we need, have, and underutilize in this city.
    But, ironically, you missed one really critical element in building this type of town.
    I contend (and I responded to the Mayor’s article in the flyer about promoting the arts here in the same way) we must first build strong, arts-based, SAFE FROM CUTS, programs in the public schools. In order to do this, money would have to be prioritized to rejuvinate the actual school facilities, attract and retain the teachers, and change the dialogue about the “importance” of these classes.
    The most critical resource that is wasted in this city is its talented youth who venture elsewhere because the city did nothing to cultivate their skills… or worse, those who never even realize they have it.
    Enrich the children who are already here, talented, and eager. Support them in their growth and then give them a community which they can stay and thrive in. They will change the dialogue of the city and they will be the lifebreath of this type of movement.

  7. Anonymous says:
    September 11, 2010 at 10:17 pm

    Your chart is full of BS. New York’s music business is not smaller than Nashville’s, and neither is Los Angeles. Been all those places.

    “It’s worth remembering the admonition of John Seeley Brown when he spoke to Leadership Memphis several years ago: “Innovation always comes from the edge. If you want innovation, don’t look to the center. That’s where you find conventional thinking and people invested in things as they are.”

    Yeah, well isn’t this the place that always argues that as long as they have a college degree, we’ll rubber stamp that hey CAN be creative?

    Chris and Scott are 100% correct. Nailed it on all counts.

    SCHOOL PROGRAMS don’t make money, but, they do teach children music, so they are NECESSARY.

    Getting the government programs in the private sector out of the way, destroying markets already established by making products and services cheaper than they can be made to make a profit is bad policy every single time.
    Our talented youth are mostly wasted, and coached to go down only ONE musical tunnel, ONE sports tunnel, Rap and Basketball. Sorry, but, it’s not a fit for everyone.
    We’re just not all hiphop, sorry.
    One act plays don’t do well.

  8. Smart City Memphis says:
    September 13, 2010 at 10:42 am

    Jaclyn: We don’t disagree with your points at all. We were just focusing on music on this post. Thanks for the insights.

    Anonymous 10:17: It’s not our list. It’s a music industry list. There’s no conflict as far as we know between having a college degree (which is responsible for about 60% of a city’s economic success) and being on the edge.

  9. Gwyn R. Fisher says:
    September 14, 2010 at 10:29 pm

    Christopher – I completely agree! Lip service makes for great sound bites, but now it’s time to fish or cut bait. So often I hear folks in nonprofit complaining about how they are all fighting for part of the same ever-shrinking pie. Instead of funding organizations that rarely show they were able to use their piece of the pie to create actual, measurable change, let’s start funding the organizations that are working to make the pie BIGGER.

Aquaphant, A Bill Day Cartoon

by Bill Day. Memphian Bill Day is two-time winner of the RFK Journalism Award in Cartooning. His cartoons are syndicated internationally by Cagle Cartoons. Cartoons Archive →

Photograph by Amie Vanderford

More Images

Memphian Amie Vanderford is a photographer for peace and justice. Her portfolio includes photographs from Peru, Zimbabwe, Nepal, Indian, and her hometown.

  • Subscribe to Posts via Email

    You can get Smart City Memphis posts right in your e-mail box. Just sign up below to begin receiving them.


     

  • RSS

    • Enhancing Fuel Efficiency in Vishakapatnam

    • Fazilka Ecocabs Offers New Paradigm for Non-Motorized Transport in Indian Cities

    • China Transportation Briefing: Filling the Finance Gap

    • TheCityFix Picks, May 4: Spare the Air, Honoring Bloomberg, BRT Experience

    • BRT Experience, Day 1: Simple yet Captivating Marketing

    • BRT Experience, Day 1: Women-Only Access on Metrobus

  • RSS

    • Megacities: Getting Creative with Urban Megadata

    • Does the Hilliness of San Francisco Affect it’s Walkability?

    • Microcities: The Rise of the Mini Home and the Walkable Neighbourhood

    • Crucible of Innovation, Memeplex of Modernity: Why Cities are Where ‘Ideas Have Sex’

    • Could Less Material Wealth Make us Happier?

    • Megacities: Eight Ideas from #citytalk for Developing Future Cities

  • RSS

    • Portfolio of the Week: Detroit's M1/DTW

    • Recycling Old Furniture by Coating It With Black Goop

    • Students Punished for Riding Bikes to School in Michigan

    • Election Day in Cairo

    • Out of Old Typeface, a City Is Born

    • What Will New York City's Bike Share Program Mean for Rider Safety?

  • Search Posts

  • About Smart City Memphis

    This is Smart City Consulting's blog and its purpose is to connect the dots and provide perspective on events, issues, and policies shaping Memphis and its future. Smart City Memphis was named one of the most intriguing blogs in the U.S. by the Pew Partnership for Civic Change, it was voted the best Memphis blog in About.com's Reader's Choice Awards, and The (Memphis) Commercial Appeal wrote: "Smart City Consulting provides some of the most well-thought-out thinking about Memphis' past, present, and future you'll find anywhere." Our blog's editor is Tom Jones, principal at Smart City Consulting and an editorial contributor at Memphis magazine, where he writes the monthly column, City Journal. Submit blog posts, ideas, suggestions, and emails to tjones@smartcityconsulting.com.
  • Archives

    • May 2012 (25)
    • April 2012 (31)
    • March 2012 (37)
    • February 2012 (32)
    • January 2012 (35)
    • December 2011 (29)
    • November 2011 (30)
    • October 2011 (34)
    • September 2011 (33)
    • August 2011 (39)
    • July 2011 (36)
    • June 2011 (41)
    • May 2011 (36)
    • April 2011 (57)
    • March 2011 (39)
    • February 2011 (45)
    • January 2011 (56)
    • December 2010 (44)
    • November 2010 (30)
    • October 2010 (28)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (22)
    • July 2010 (23)
    • June 2010 (34)
    • May 2010 (28)
    • April 2010 (32)
    • March 2010 (35)
    • February 2010 (31)
    • January 2010 (43)
    • December 2009 (49)
    • November 2009 (17)
    • October 2009 (24)
    • September 2009 (23)
    • August 2009 (18)
    • July 2009 (22)
    • June 2009 (28)
    • May 2009 (23)
    • April 2009 (23)
    • March 2009 (26)
    • February 2009 (25)
    • January 2009 (36)
    • December 2008 (15)
    • November 2008 (22)
    • October 2008 (21)
    • September 2008 (25)
    • August 2008 (23)
    • July 2008 (32)
    • June 2008 (27)
    • May 2008 (35)
    • April 2008 (26)
    • March 2008 (25)
    • February 2008 (29)
    • January 2008 (33)
    • December 2007 (20)
    • November 2007 (19)
    • October 2007 (32)
    • September 2007 (25)
    • August 2007 (25)
    • July 2007 (26)
    • June 2007 (16)
    • May 2007 (21)
    • April 2007 (25)
    • March 2007 (18)
    • February 2007 (16)
    • January 2007 (17)
    • December 2006 (16)
    • November 2006 (14)
    • October 2006 (18)
    • September 2006 (21)
    • August 2006 (20)
    • July 2006 (20)
    • June 2006 (17)
    • May 2006 (12)
    • April 2006 (19)
    • March 2006 (20)
    • February 2006 (23)
    • January 2006 (16)
    • December 2005 (23)
    • November 2005 (21)
    • October 2005 (23)
    • September 2005 (19)
    • August 2005 (27)
    • July 2005 (23)
    • June 2005 (16)
    • 0 (2)
  • Categories

  • Contributors

    • Aaron Shafer
    • Andrew Trippel
    • Anthony Siracusa
    • Barry Chase
    • Brad Leon
    • Brian Stephens
    • CEOs for Cities
    • Charles Santo
    • Chris Sanders
    • David Williams
    • Doug Imig
    • Elizabeth Alley
    • Emily Trenholm
    • Eric Mathews
    • Gene Pearson
    • Gene Pearson and Louise Mercuro
    • Greg Thompson
    • Gwyn Fisher
    • Janet Boscarino
    • Jim Strickland
    • Jimmie Covington
    • John Kirkscey
    • John Lawrence
    • Jonathan Flynt
    • Josh Whitehead
    • Julie Ellis
    • Kenya Bradshaw
    • Laura Adams
    • Leah Wells
    • Louise Mercuro, AICP
    • Lurene Cachola Kelley
    • Margot McNeeley
    • Mark James
    • Matt Farr
    • Matt Timberlake
    • Melissa Petersen
    • Natashia Gregoire
    • Ray Brown
    • Rev. Steve Montgomery
    • Robert Bain
    • SCM
    • Scott L. Newstok
    • Smart City Memphis
    • Smart City Radio
    • Steve Bares
    • Steve Lockwood
    • Susan Adler Thorp
    • Tom Jones
    • Tomeka Hart
    • Tommy Pacello
    • Women Unite
    • Zach Hoyt

© 2012 Smart City Memphis. All rights reserved.

  • Register
  • Log in
  • RSS
  • Smart City Radio
  • Smart City Consulting