Smart City Memphis
 

Sign up or Login

I-269: Driving Greater Economic Segregation for Memphis

by Smart City Memphis (RSS) | February 5th, 2010 12:05am CST

i269 route

The reason we are so exorcised about I-269 and other sprawl-inducing highway projects are because they deepen the economic segregation that holds back Memphis’ progress.

Memphis is #1 in economic segregation among the largest 50 metros in the U.S.

Here’s the kicker: sprawl is a major cause of economic isolation, and economic isolation in turn exacerbates poverty and creates obstacles for residents to connect with the social networks that are often essential to employment and improved lifestyles.  So we hope all the cheerleaders for an unnecessary interstate looping around Shelby County will forgive us, but their justifications are strained and their promises for thoughtful planning along its route are vague and hyperbolic.

Well-connected cities have less division between economic groups, and based on the recent decibel level here, it shouldn’t be too surprising that we are at the top of the list of economically segregated cities. Nashville is #38.

Cross Purposes

Meanwhile, the economic segregation results in concentrated poverty that is the seedbed for our city’s most serious problems and derails our best efforts to address them. Projects like I-269 promise only to make them worse, because every problem becomes harder to deal with in cities that are economically segregated.

In other words, at the precise time when every city, county and state agency should be focused on encouraging infill redevelopment that revives and stabilizes Memphis neighborhoods, our transportation investments hollow them out, and leaders appear unable to turn the tide and abandon the idea that sprawl is “growth.”

At the same time, the cause and effect — connecting the dots — between sprawl, the climbing Memphis tax rate, and an economically polarized city are overwhelmed by the influence of those who drive these transportation projects.

The inattention to the urban center that fuels our regional economy is symbolized by I-269, but its impact will be real and immediate. It will further produce an economically polarized city where fewer and fewer Memphis workers are paying more and more in taxes — including those spent for services and amenities that are in truth regional.

Green-washing

Let us say this clearly and unequivocably: there is no economic or social benefit to City of Memphis as a result of I-269. Don’t believe the propaganda or the breathless media headlines.

Wrapping I-269 in a shroud of terms like smart growth, knowledge economy jobs, New Urbanism and open space protection, supporters of the interstate suggest with straight faces that Memphis will benefit from new economic growth and development that the interstate will provide. If our past teaches us anything, it is that the I-269 corridor will be characterized by unwalkable, car-centric sameness.

Someone from North Mississippi said in an article in The Commercial Appeal that the task now is to apply smart growth principles to I-269. We’re not sure when we’ve heard such a contradiction of terms. It reminds us of the story on NPR about the developer proudly boasting of the region’s most sustainable residential development – green energy, walking trails, etc. There was only one problem: it was an hour commute to New York and an hour and half commute to Philadelphia.

It’s the kind of green-washing that’s being done by developers and economic development types to try to put a pretty face on projects that are clearly unsustainable.

Making It Worse

Here’s the thing: Memphis’ ability to compete in the new economy is undercut by the hollowing out of the middle class, by the worst economic segregation of the 50 largest metros, by the quickening loss of college-educated 25-34 year-olds, a 15% house vacancy rate that’s doubled since 2000 and 20% of Memphis families living on less than $8,700 a year.

These are the forces driving Memphis’ trajectory and defining our future. There is nothing in I-269 that does anything to improve these trends that are threatening the future of our city. More to the point and despite the denial by our suburban cities, the trends of Memphis will in fact determine the future of the entire region.

If Memphis must live with the problems that are exacerbated by I-269, we must do more than all pledge our commitment to regional planning. More to the point, we must change policies so that the interstate does in fact mitigate its negative impact.

For example, we’re said previously that I-269 and Tennessee 385 should be toll roads. They would produce more than $100 million a year that could be invested in strategies to strengthen our core city and to make Memphis a city of choice.

Nontraditional Thinking

There are other innovations like a higher sales tax along the route to establish a tax-sharing program that could direct money into the improvement of Memphis neighborhoods. Or perhaps there’s a way to pass impact fees and sustainability guidelines for development along the interstate route, to set up land trusts and to require the same level of public investments in public transit.

In a perfect world, our local and state officials would simply turn down the federal money for I-269, calling Mississippi’s bluff as it is faced with the interstate version of an oxbow lake. Perhaps, it’s not too late to call on our leaders to say enough is enough and make the most important decision facing them – doing what’s right for Memphis.

But, I-269 exists because of politics. That’s why we think the answer needs to be found in the same place.

These are difficult times for the Memphis metro – let’s say it again, metro. Unlike most other metro areas, the cancerous problems that threaten our economic health are regional and not just the problems of the city. Unless we start to figure out how to avoid self-indulgent projects like I-269 and make the investments that strengthen our entire region so that it is prepared for the fundamental restructuring of the economy that is well under way, we will prove that the road to hell is indeed paved with intentions that aren’t always good.

In the end, it’s not great roads that will draw jobs to Memphis. It’s great quality of life, a culture of creativity and a willingness to support dreamers and entrepreneurs that will attract the talented people that in turn attract jobs to our community. The blind pursuit of more lanes and more roads without the fuller context for community in time creates an incomplete plan for transportation and replicates the same mistaken policies of the past.

Tags: Uncategorized

Categories: Uncategorized

Comments RSS Feed

Tweet

4 Comments

  1. John says:
    February 5, 2010 at 8:59 am

    In case anyone is tempted to argue with SC about this, I am attaching links to two documents.

    http://stlouisfed.org/publications/br/articles/?id=706

    http://www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/0_4420_1.pdf

    The Cost of Sprawl in the Memphis MSA is a brief report to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis understandably summarizing the effects of expansion through the year 2000 and its influence on things like regional taxes, government expenses, law enforcement, commute time, road construction and education. It is a frightening look at things… because it is ten years old.

    TECHNIQUES FOR MITIGATING URBAN SPRAWL: GOALS, CHARACTERISTICS, AND SUITABILITY FACTORS is an easier read than it sounds. This document, produced by the University of Texas Center for Transportation Research for the Texas DOT, has a fabulously brief explanation of the highway system’s influence on sprawl but also gives a laundry list of mitigation techniques including:

    Ten Transportation Efficient Land Use & Development Strategies
    Seven Pricing Strategies for Automobiles, Roadways and Transit
    Fifteen Alternative Mode Support Strategies
    Six Worksite Based Strategies
    Three Objectives Based Incentives
    A Fix-It-First Strategy for Roadway Investment
    Six Plan Coordination & Integration Strategies
    Twenty-Seven Strategies for Urban Containment & Revitalization
    Ten Natural Resource Preservation Strategies
    Ten Facility Adequacy, Timing & Budgeting Strategies
    Thirteen Coordinating Assignments

  2. Ken says:
    February 5, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    I’m not sure how the currently finished portions of this route relate to the funds for an official “I-269″, but it seems inevitable and we must do something to encourage infill of the beautiful downtown and inner loop areas with FAMILIES and entrepreneurs. Our metro area needs to be ONE Memphis. There are three colleges locating into downtown this year – life is continuing to spring back, let’s find a way to direct some of the I-69/269 money towards drawing the travelers INTO our vibrant and diverse city center. Maybe the I-69 portion at least could improve the exits and further showcase some of our inner assets along its path, especially from I-55 junction to 240′s turn eastward.

  3. Charles says:
    February 7, 2010 at 10:45 am

    Let us keep in mind that I-269 is not the reason that Memphis is CURRENTLY #1 in economic segregation. It is the pro-ridiculous sprawl policies of the City and County gov’t. Annexation is the only way that the city has actually grown in population! We need like 2 million new residents in the City of Memphis just to justify the size of the current city.

    I am just not sure that I-269 will make it much worse than it already is

  4. dwayne says:
    February 7, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    This year’s County mayoral election will be very important in curbing sprawl. I hope SCM will put each candidate under a microscope and then post the results.

Our Fracking Congress

by Bill Day. Memphian Bill Day is two-time winner of the RFK Journalism Award in Cartooning. His cartoons are syndicated internationally by Cagle Cartoons. Cartoons Archive →

Photograph by Amie Vanderford

More Images

Memphian Amie Vanderford is a photographer for peace and justice. Her portfolio includes photographs from Peru, Zimbabwe, Nepal, Indian, and her hometown.

  • Subscribe to Posts via Email

    You can get Smart City Memphis posts right in your e-mail box. Just sign up below to begin receiving them.


     

  • RSS

    • New Videos: Stories of Auto-Rickshaws in India

    • Sustainable Urban Transport in India: Role of the Auto-Rickshaw Sector

    • New Competition: Encouraging Youth to Rethink Public Transportation

    • Paris to Allow Cyclists to Run Red Lights

    • Research Recap, February 6: Urban Happiness, Electric Highways, Cooperative ITS

    • Living Without a Car in Bogotá: Day 12

  • RSS

    • How Bogotá Inspired Sustainable Cities Across the Globe

    • The Changing Face of Housing

    • How Seville’s Hidden Treasures Became the World’s Largest Glued Wood Structure

    • Four Pioneering Examples of Sustainable Refurbishment from Around the World

    • Do You Have an Idea for our Urban World? 21 Cities, 90 Million Citizens are Interested

    • #CycleSafe – Eight Achievable Steps for Creating Cities fit for Cycling

  • RSS

    • In Toronto, a Major Victory for Light Rail

    • Postcard From Cologne

    • How To Make a Building Restoration Into a Hot Spot

    • Getting a Handel on Transit Crime

    • The Secret to a Successful Urban Stadium

    • Should Public Trees Bear Fruit?

  • Search Posts

  • About Smart City Memphis

    This is the blog by Smart City Consulting and its opinions are informed by our work in Memphis and other cities on a variety of issues affecting urban success. Smart City Memphis was named one of the most intriguing blogs in the U.S. by the Pew Partnership for Civic Change. Our intent is to "connect the dots" on events, issues, and policies that shape Memphis and its future, and to frame Memphis issues in a national context. The blog's editor is Tom Jones, principal at Smart City Consulting and an editorial contributor at Memphis magazine, where he writes the monthly column, City Journal. Send blog posts, ideas, suggestions, and emails to tjones@smartcityconsulting.com.
  • Archives

    • February 2012 (12)
    • January 2012 (35)
    • December 2011 (29)
    • November 2011 (30)
    • October 2011 (34)
    • September 2011 (33)
    • August 2011 (39)
    • July 2011 (36)
    • June 2011 (41)
    • May 2011 (36)
    • April 2011 (57)
    • March 2011 (39)
    • February 2011 (45)
    • January 2011 (56)
    • December 2010 (44)
    • November 2010 (30)
    • October 2010 (28)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (22)
    • July 2010 (23)
    • June 2010 (34)
    • May 2010 (28)
    • April 2010 (32)
    • March 2010 (35)
    • February 2010 (31)
    • January 2010 (43)
    • December 2009 (49)
    • November 2009 (17)
    • October 2009 (24)
    • September 2009 (23)
    • August 2009 (18)
    • July 2009 (22)
    • June 2009 (28)
    • May 2009 (23)
    • April 2009 (23)
    • March 2009 (26)
    • February 2009 (25)
    • January 2009 (36)
    • December 2008 (15)
    • November 2008 (22)
    • October 2008 (21)
    • September 2008 (25)
    • August 2008 (23)
    • July 2008 (32)
    • June 2008 (27)
    • May 2008 (35)
    • April 2008 (26)
    • March 2008 (25)
    • February 2008 (29)
    • January 2008 (33)
    • December 2007 (20)
    • November 2007 (19)
    • October 2007 (32)
    • September 2007 (25)
    • August 2007 (25)
    • July 2007 (26)
    • June 2007 (16)
    • May 2007 (21)
    • April 2007 (25)
    • March 2007 (18)
    • February 2007 (16)
    • January 2007 (17)
    • December 2006 (16)
    • November 2006 (14)
    • October 2006 (18)
    • September 2006 (21)
    • August 2006 (20)
    • July 2006 (20)
    • June 2006 (17)
    • May 2006 (12)
    • April 2006 (19)
    • March 2006 (20)
    • February 2006 (23)
    • January 2006 (16)
    • December 2005 (23)
    • November 2005 (21)
    • October 2005 (23)
    • September 2005 (19)
    • August 2005 (27)
    • July 2005 (23)
    • June 2005 (16)
    • 0 (2)
  • Categories

  • Contributors

    • Aaron Shafer
    • Andrew Trippel
    • Anthony Siracusa
    • Barry Chase
    • Brad Leon
    • Brian Stephens
    • CEOs for Cities
    • Charles Santo
    • Chris Sanders
    • David Williams
    • Doug Imig
    • Elizabeth Alley
    • Emily Trenholm
    • Eric Mathews
    • Gene Pearson
    • Gene Pearson and Louise Mercuro
    • Greg Thompson
    • Gwyn Fisher
    • Janet Boscarino
    • Jim Strickland
    • Jimmie Covington
    • John Kirkscey
    • John Lawrence
    • Jonathan Flynt
    • Josh Whitehead
    • Julie Ellis
    • Kenya Bradshaw
    • Laura Adams
    • Leah Wells
    • Louise Mercuro, AICP
    • Lurene Cachola Kelley
    • Margot McNeeley
    • Matt Farr
    • Matt Timberlake
    • Melissa Petersen
    • Natashia Gregoire
    • Ray Brown
    • Rev. Steve Montgomery
    • Robert Bain
    • SCM
    • Scott L. Newstok
    • Smart City Memphis
    • Smart City Radio
    • Steve Bares
    • Steve Lockwood
    • Susan Adler Thorp
    • Tom Jones
    • Tomeka Hart
    • Tommy Pacello
    • Women Unite
    • Zach Hoyt

© 2012 Smart City Memphis. All rights reserved.

  • Register
  • Log in
  • RSS
  • Smart City Radio
  • Smart City Consulting