Smart City Memphis
 

Sign up or Login

Who and What the Millennials Really Are

by SCM (RSS) | August 10th, 2012 3:01pm CDT

Tweet

From bcg.perspectives:

Move aside, U.S. baby boomers. The Millennial generation is bigger than you and growing in influence. (See Exhibit 1.) Now numbering 79 million (compared with the boomers’ 76 million), U.S. Millennials—people between the ages of 16 and 34—have been the subject of abundant analysis and commentary, mostly revolving around their avid use of technology, changing media-consumption habits, and entry into the workforce. Less has been written about Millennials as consumers. How do they interact with brands? Where do they eat and shop? How do they make buying decisions, and what factors influence their opinions and choices? Is it true that Millennials consume less than previous generations? On average, U.S. Millennials already shell out and influence the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars annually—an amount that will only increase as they mature into their peak earning and spending years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Millennials’ expectations are different from those of previous generations, and companies will need to rethink their brands, business models, and marketing accordingly. Yet our research shows that many executives who make product and service decisions for their companies have negative or dismissive attitudes toward Millennials. Clearly, companies will have to understand, accept, and embrace the characteristics and values of this generation if they are to create and market relevant products and services that resonate with them and meet their needs.

Although the youngest members of the Millennial generation are still economically dependent on Mom and Dad, older Millennials are beginning to enter their peak spending years. While they are not yet set in their ways, they are forming preferences, exhibiting tendencies, and influencing one another’s opinions and behaviors. This generation engages with brands, channels, and service models in new ways limited only by the rate of technological advancement and innovation.

To better understand this generation, The Boston Consulting Group, along with Barkley and Service Management Group, surveyed 4,000 Millennials (ages 16 to 34) and 1,000 non-Millennials (ages 35 to 74) in the United States. A key goal of this research was to identify how behaviors and attitudes differ between the two groups and determine which of those differences are truly generational characteristics of Millennials—and not merely qualities associated with youth in general. We extended the broadly accepted definition of “Millennial” a few years beyond the upper end of the age range in order to capture the pivotal years during which Millennials transition to the next stage of life. This allowed us to gain greater insights into which of their attitudes and behaviors might change later in life and how.

The first of two reports, this overview of Millennial consumers explores who they are today and what they think of themselves and the world around them. We’ll also examine the six different segments of U.S. Millennials that our research revealed. In our second report, we’ll delve deeper into the industry sectors and categories that the survey addressed, such as how the members of this generation shop for apparel and groceries, where they eat out, how they travel, and their favorite brands relative to non-Millennials.

The Risk of Stereotyping

Our survey asked U.S. Millennials and non-Millennials which words best describe the Millennial generation. While Millennials’ perceptions of themselves are generally favorable, non-Millennials tend to view them far less kindly, often referring to them as “spoiled,” “lazy,” or “entitled.” (See Exhibit 2.) These perceptions may be coloring how executives view the Millennial consumer, preventing companies from understanding and fully addressing the product and service needs of this generation—and establishing strong brand relationships.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We found a generation engaged in consuming and influencing, one that embraces business and government and believes that such institutions can bring about global change, one that is generally optimistic, and one that has often-unexpected attitudes and behaviors. Those companies that truly “get” the Millennials and engage with them appropriately have an opportunity to differentiate themselves in the marketplace and forge long-term relationships with their customers.

Our research did confirm one stereotype: U.S. Millennials are extremely comfortable with technology. They are “digital natives,” meaning that they’ve largely grown up with technology and social media, using these new tools as a natural, integral part of life and work. Millennials consider themselves fast adopters of new technologies and applications, and they are far more likely than non-Millennials to be the very first or among the first to try a new technology. They also tend to own multiple devices such as smartphones, tablets, and gaming systems. More U.S. Millennials than non-Millennials reported using MP3 players (72 percent versus 44 percent), gaming platforms (67 percent versus 41 percent), and smartphones (59 percent versus 33 percent), while more non-Millennials reported using desktop computers at home (80 percent versus 63 percent) and basic cell phones (66 percent versus 46 percent). As a result, U.S. Millennials are much more likely to multitask while online, constantly moving across platforms—mobile, social, PC, and gaming.

Both groups spend roughly the same amount of time online, but Millennials are more likely to use the Internet as a platform to broadcast their thoughts and experiences and to contribute user-generated content. They are far more engaged in activities such as rating products and services (60 percent versus 46 percent of non-Millennials) and uploading videos, images, and blog entries to the Web (60 percent versus 29 percent).

It’s no surprise that U.S. Millennials spend less time reading printed books and watching TV. Only 26 percent watch TV for 20 hours or more per week (compared with 49 percent of non-Millennials), and when they do watch, they’re more likely to do so on their computers through services such as Hulu (42 percent versus 18 percent).

Beyond Millennials’ widely recognized affinity for technology, our research identified a variety of unique behaviors and attitudes that these individuals are likely to bring to their next life stages.

“I want it fast, and I want it now.” U.S. Millennials are all about instant gratification. They put a premium on speed, ease, efficiency, and convenience in all their transactions. For example, Millennials shop for groceries at convenience stores twice as often as non-Millennials. They also value getting through the line quickly in so-called fast-casual restaurants (upscale fast-food chains without table service, such as Chipotle) (81 percent versus 71 percent) and care relatively less about “friendly” service. This preference for efficiency is even reflected in how they participate in causes. Of Millennials who make direct donations (34 percent), almost half donate through their mobile devices (15 percent), compared with only 5 percent of non-Millennials. To meet the expectations of this generation, companies will need to rethink their existing customer-service models. These consumers are always in a hurry, and it’s critical to determine how you can get them to spend time developing a relationship with your brand.

“I trust my friends more than ‘corporate mouthpieces’.” For this generation, the definition of “expert”—a person with the credibility to recommend brands, products, and services—has shifted from someone with professional or academic credentials to potentially anyone with firsthand experience, ideally a peer or close friend. U.S. Millennials also tend to seek multiple sources of information, especially from noncorporate channels, and they’re likely to consult their friends before making purchase decisions. For example, more Millennials than non-Millennials reported using a mobile device to read user reviews and to research products while shopping (50 percent versus 21 percent). “Crowd sourcing”— tapping into the collective intelligence of the public or one’s peer group—has become particularly popular. The reach and accessibility of social media have amplified the voice of individual consumers. Now anyone can become an expert. Messages that resonate are quickly spread and reinforced through user reviews and other online forums. Given this new reality, companies must monitor what is being said about their brands and participate in the conversation, especially since Millennials are much more likely than non-Millennials to explore brands on social networks (53 percent versus 37 percent). It may also be time to reevaluate whether current brand endorsers are credible and effective with this audience, because while the right brand advocates can be very influential, the wrong ones can be detrimental.

“I’m a social creature—both online and offline.” Although both generations value personal connections, U.S. Millennials use technology to connect with a greater number of people, more frequently, and in real time. Millennials use social-media platforms more than non-Millennials (79 percent versus 59 percent), and they maintain significantly larger networks: 46 percent have 200 or more “friends” on Facebook, compared with 19 percent of non-Millennials. Millennials feel that they are missing out when they’re not up to date with social-media chatter, and they feel validated when the community “likes” their posts. When it comes to making purchases, Millennials are far more likely than non-Millennials to favor brands that have Facebook pages and mobile websites (33 percent versus 17 percent). They overwhelmingly agree (47 percent versus 28 percent) that their lives feel richer when they’re connected to people through social media.

This desire for connection and shared experience also extends offline. Millennials are much more likely than non-Millennials to engage in group activities—especially with people outside their immediate family. They dine, shop, and travel with friends and coworkers, to whom they look for validation that they’ve made the right decisions. This can be good news for retailers and restaurants, since groups of consumers tend to spend more money than people who are by themselves. Smart companies are using location-based shopping services such as Foursquare and Shopkick to capitalize on this trend.

“I can make the world a better place.” The generation that was taught to recycle in kindergarten wants to be good to the planet and believes that collective action can make a difference. Millennials believe that working for causes is an integral part of life, and they are drawn to big issues. Instead of making one-off charitable donations in cash or in kind, they’re more likely to integrate their causes into daily life by buying products that support sustainable farming or “fair trade” principles, or by joining large movements that aim to solve social or environmental problems. Our survey found that Millennials, more than non-Millennials, prefer to actively engage in a cause campaign by encouraging others to support it (30 percent versus 22 percent) or by participating in fundraising events (27 percent versus 16 percent).

U.S. Millennials are receptive to cause marketing and are more likely than non-Millennials to purchase items associated with a particular cause (37 percent versus 30 percent). Millennials expect companies to care about social issues and will reward those that partner with the right causes. Recent examples of successful campaigns are Nike’s Livestrong campaign and the Nike(Red) “Lace Up, Save Lives” campaign to fight HIV/AIDS in Africa. Despite this affinity for causes, the great wave of volunteerism that was generally expected of this generation has not materialized. Millennials are only slightly more likely than non-Millennials to volunteer their time (31 percent versus 26 percent), a difference that is likely a function of more free time rather than a greater commitment to social issues. Indeed, the word “slacktivism” was coined to describe the sort of engagement in a cause that requires little personal effort.

Other key Millennial beliefs and attitudes that our survey revealed were a general egocentrism beyond what would be expected of young people, a global viewpoint, and overall tech-savviness. We also discovered two attitudes that appear to be more life-stage specific: a tendency to live in the moment and to make decisions at the last minute, as well as a desire to leverage the resources of large entities—such as government—to change the world rather than to act alone.

To read more, click here.

 

Categories: Uncategorized

Comments RSS Feed

Comments are closed.

Kidnapped Women, A Bill Day Cartoon

by Bill Day. Memphian Bill Day is two-time winner of the RFK Journalism Award in Cartooning. His cartoons are syndicated internationally by Cagle Cartoons. Cartoons Archive →

Photograph by Amie Vanderford

More Images

This ongoing series of photographs is intended to show the daily lives of these single mothers in order to invoke recognition of their similarities to all mothers, along with understanding and empathy from the viewer of the strengths that these single mothers possess within the challenging situations they face. My hope is that newfound empathy with these mothers’ lives will give people some pause before they condemn single mothers when discussing issues such as welfare and other politically charged hot buttons.

  • Subscribe to Posts via Email

    You can get Smart City Memphis posts right in your e-mail box. Just sign up below to begin receiving them.


     

  • RSS

    • Friday Fun: Self-driving automobile + Bus + Taxi = Otobuxi

    • Q&A with Hernan Navarro: Lima’s El Metropolitano BRT

    • Should the speed limit on arterial roads increase?

    • Promoting ridesharing for the daily commute in Mumbai

    • iBus, a new BRT changing the transport landscape in Indore, India

    • Architect of possible dreams

  • RSS

    • The Economic and Educational Value of Retrofitting Schools

    • Greening Cities with Better Bike Lanes

    • Texas and Bangladesh: Tragedies of Placeless Economics

    • Urban Ideology in Obama’s Brand of Regionalism

    • The DIY Disaster Plan

    • Healthy Communities at the Placemaking Leadership Council

  • RSS

    • Brussels Does Not Take Kindly To People Messing With Its Peeing Boy Statue

    • When Gun Control Fails: Best #Cityreads of the Week

    • Engineering Feat of the Day: A 7-Million Pound Building on 40-Foot Stilts

    • Does Living Near Fast Food Restaurants Increase Your Risk of Obesity?

    • New Hampshire Town Sues Parking Meter Vigilantes

    • Terrifying Images of the Damage Wrought by the Texas Tornadoes

  • Search Posts

  • About Smart City Memphis

    This is Smart City Consulting's blog and its purpose is to connect the dots and provide perspective on events, issues, and policies shaping Memphis and its future. Smart City Memphis was named one of the most intriguing blogs in the U.S. by the Pew Partnership for Civic Change, it was voted the best Memphis blog in About.com's Reader's Choice Awards, and The (Memphis) Commercial Appeal wrote: "Smart City Memphis provides some of the most well-thought-out thinking about Memphis' past, present, and future you'll find anywhere." Our blog's editor is Tom Jones, principal at Smart City Consulting and an editorial contributor at Memphis magazine, where he writes the monthly column, City Journal. Submit blog posts, ideas, suggestions, and emails to tjones@smartcityconsulting.com.
  • Archives

    • May 2013 (18)
    • April 2013 (34)
    • March 2013 (27)
    • February 2013 (31)
    • January 2013 (30)
    • December 2012 (29)
    • November 2012 (31)
    • October 2012 (33)
    • September 2012 (29)
    • August 2012 (33)
    • July 2012 (26)
    • June 2012 (33)
    • May 2012 (33)
    • April 2012 (31)
    • March 2012 (37)
    • February 2012 (32)
    • January 2012 (35)
    • December 2011 (29)
    • November 2011 (30)
    • October 2011 (34)
    • September 2011 (33)
    • August 2011 (39)
    • July 2011 (36)
    • June 2011 (41)
    • May 2011 (36)
    • April 2011 (57)
    • March 2011 (39)
    • February 2011 (45)
    • January 2011 (56)
    • December 2010 (44)
    • November 2010 (30)
    • October 2010 (28)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (22)
    • July 2010 (23)
    • June 2010 (34)
    • May 2010 (28)
    • April 2010 (32)
    • March 2010 (35)
    • February 2010 (31)
    • January 2010 (43)
    • December 2009 (49)
    • November 2009 (17)
    • October 2009 (24)
    • September 2009 (23)
    • August 2009 (18)
    • July 2009 (22)
    • June 2009 (28)
    • May 2009 (23)
    • April 2009 (23)
    • March 2009 (26)
    • February 2009 (25)
    • January 2009 (36)
    • December 2008 (15)
    • November 2008 (22)
    • October 2008 (21)
    • September 2008 (25)
    • August 2008 (23)
    • July 2008 (32)
    • June 2008 (27)
    • May 2008 (35)
    • April 2008 (26)
    • March 2008 (25)
    • February 2008 (29)
    • January 2008 (33)
    • December 2007 (20)
    • November 2007 (19)
    • October 2007 (32)
    • September 2007 (25)
    • August 2007 (25)
    • July 2007 (26)
    • June 2007 (16)
    • May 2007 (21)
    • April 2007 (25)
    • March 2007 (18)
    • February 2007 (16)
    • January 2007 (17)
    • December 2006 (16)
    • November 2006 (14)
    • October 2006 (18)
    • September 2006 (21)
    • August 2006 (20)
    • July 2006 (20)
    • June 2006 (17)
    • May 2006 (12)
    • April 2006 (19)
    • March 2006 (20)
    • February 2006 (23)
    • January 2006 (16)
    • December 2005 (23)
    • November 2005 (21)
    • October 2005 (23)
    • September 2005 (19)
    • August 2005 (27)
    • July 2005 (23)
    • June 2005 (16)
    • 0 (2)
  • Categories

  • Contributors

    • Aaron Shafer
    • Andrew Trippel
    • Anthony Siracusa
    • Barry Chase
    • Brad Leon
    • Brian Stephens
    • CEOs for Cities
    • Charles Santo
    • Chris Sanders
    • Crosstown Collaborative
    • David Williams
    • Doug Imig
    • Elizabeth Alley
    • Elizabeth Lemmonds
    • Emily Trenholm
    • Eric Mathews
    • Gene Pearson
    • Gene Pearson and Louise Mercuro
    • George Lord
    • Greg Thompson
    • Gwyn Fisher
    • Janet Boscarino
    • Jim Strickland
    • Jimmie Covington
    • John Kirkscey
    • John Lawrence
    • Jonathan Flynt
    • Josh Whitehead
    • Julie Ellis
    • Kenya Bradshaw
    • Laura Adams
    • Leah Wells
    • Louise Mercuro, AICP
    • Lurene Cachola Kelley
    • Margot McNeeley
    • Mark James
    • Matt Farr
    • Matt Timberlake
    • Melissa Petersen
    • Natashia Gregoire
    • Ray Brown
    • Rev. Steve Montgomery
    • Robert Bain
    • SCM
    • Scott L. Newstok
    • Smart City Memphis
    • Smart City Radio
    • Steve Bares
    • Steve Lockwood
    • Susan Adler Thorp
    • Tom Jones
    • Tomeka Hart
    • Tommy Pacello
    • Women Unite
    • Zach Hoyt

© 20111-2013 Smart City Memphis. All rights reserved.

  • Register
  • Log in
  • RSS
  • Smart City Radio
  • Smart City Consulting