Smart City Memphis
 

Sign up or Login

City Bashing As Suburban Political Pasttime

by Smart City Memphis (RSS) | July 18th, 2012 12:43am CDT

Tweet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It’s a favorite refrain of voters outside Memphis: If only Memphis would quit electing incompetent elected officials, we would be willing to love the city that we depend on for jobs and entertainment.

Of course, it’s all rhetoric.  There’s nothing that’s ever going to be good enough that these anti-Memphis voters won’t find some reason to trash the city.
But that’s not the point of this post.
Instead, it’s about the threadbare narrative that goes unchecked by the news media that the leadership outside Memphis is highly qualified and the leadership inside Memphis is inept and ill-equipped for their jobs.  If anybody should be making those comments about ineptitude, it should be Memphians talking about suburban elected officials.
When you look at these suburban politicians as a group, it leads you to wonder if there was some cosmic event that allowed Mark Norris to be elected state senator.  While that’s faint praise and we don’t agree with him much, at least he can string together a syllogism when needed. He’s head master of a motley group that dependably plays to the lowest common denominator, pandering to the fears of their constituents about “those people” in Memphis and pursuing such enlightened political positions as guns in parks and restaurants, anti-science laws, voter ID, and that’s only a start at the inane policies being pushed.
Undebatable
We heard it especially during the government consolidation debate as county elected officials belittled Memphis leaders.  It was a remarkable assertion, especially considering that the Millington commissioner making the charge was at the time mangling the facts as easily as he mangled the rules of grammar.
Back then, he complained that the charter commission didn’t give the public enough time to consider the new charter (state law sets the timeline), he complained that single source funding will increase taxes (single source funding is state law), he said that there is no real annexation in our future (actually Memphis has 150 more square miles it can annex), and criticisms that Memphis should get its house in order (although it’s his county government that’s driving up taxes and costs of government here, not Memphis).
Lately, we’ve been reminded again that Memphians should refuse once and for all to listen to the underlying narrative of the suburbs – white Republicans good and African-American Democrats bad.
Mental Ammunition
The suburban “leaders” regularly take their message to the basest bias of their voters:  Memphis is bad, Memphians are the problem, we have to protect ourselves from Memphis, we need our guns to protect ourselves from those people.
It’s a sad commentary on suburban voters, but it’s a reminder that our low educational attainment level is not merely reflected in the people living in poverty inside Memphis, but the people living in their own selfish superiority outside Memphis.
There’s always been a vein of anti-intellectualism in Southern politics (it seems to have spread to a national level these days) and the victors at the polls for suburban elected offices remind us of the power of fear over facts every day.
Why Are These White People So Mad?
Outside Memphis, all the women are strong, all the men are good looking, and all the children are above average.  Out in God’s country, people are smarter, richer, and happier.
So, what in the heck happens to all these superior people when they enter the voting booth?  What are they so angry about?  Where does all this hostility to Memphis come from?  You’re not in Memphis so why do you care?
It’s hard for us to say.  Although it’s tempting to chalk up all of this to the neverending yin and yang of race in our community, perhaps they’re just mad, period.  And they fail to see the contradictions in so much of what they say as when, in the same debate, Memphis (translate: black Memphis) was blamed this amorphous Memphis for the decline of Frayser, Whitehaven and Hickory Hill.
It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy.  It’s also blame the victim. Those areas weren’t doomed when they were annexed by Memphis.  It’s worth remembering that Frayser was annexed 50 years ago and Whitehaven 40 years ago, and despite what some people are saying, they receive all services of City of Memphis.
Blaming the Victim
More to the point, a fundamental part of the problem isn’t about Memphis at all.  It is the way that Shelby County Government turned the roles of government inside out.
County government wasn’t supposed to provide urban services, but once the office of county mayor was created, mayors wanted to lock in the non-Memphis vote and they did it by providing services that are normally and logically provided by cities.
As a result, county government eroded the dividing line between county and city services and weakened the legal logic that said urban services come with city taxes.  It’s also what drove up the costs of county government and created the mentality that made sprawl acceptable.  It also fed the “we versus they” attitude that is so pervasive here, but especially in the ‘burbs, and it wasn’t about a grand philosophy of government at all, it was about political advantage.
It’s also laughable to hear a county commissioner from Millington – stagnant in jobs growth, population growth flat, poverty rising, and neighborhoods deteriorating – criticize Memphis neighborhoods for their lack of progress and success.  But here’s the main thing: It wasn’t city government that caused Frayser, Whitehaven and Hickory Hill to have problems.  It was white flight, the abandonment of the city for reasons personal and racial.  That’s why it’s so galling to hear some suburbanites blaming Memphis officials.  It was whites who set the deterioration in motion, and now, they blame the people who stayed behind and are trying to fix it.
Exhausted Rhetoric
Their resolve to paint Memphis with a broad brush is testament to a characteristic that defines politics way too much these days. It’s all about them.  It’s all about winning and losing, no matter what degree of pandering it takes.
So in addition to guns in parks and restaurants, suburban politicians offer up legislation that would prevent Memphis from passing living wage ordinances, that would close public records of people with permits to carry guns, that would dumb down ethics rules and weaken public meetings laws, that would use schools as vehicles for their version of Christianity, that would have rejected stimulus funding, that would deny full rights to all people, well, you get the picture.
It’s a cynical strategy in which there is no saturation point for partisanship and the self-motivation of their own political success, damn the best interests of the community or any responsibility to contribute to meaningful public discussion or to healing the divisions that put a hole in the boat that we’re all passengers in.

Categories: City of Memphis Government, Politics and Government

Comments RSS Feed

7 Comments

  1. Anonymous says:
    July 18, 2012 at 10:38 am

    This area is doomed; no one wants to work together here. Political and economic capital is completely wasted in fighting each other instead of looking for ways to cooperate and compromise. Too much hate, too much spite. Too much ngrained corruption all over (not just in Memphis proper). Instead of trying to bring in new business from outisde the region, certain suburbs make all their hay in trying to poach business from Memphis (mainly b/c these suburbs, as great as they think they are, cannot compete with the suburbs of other more progressive and better metro areas). Look at what that dimwit in Southaven has done over the past few years. And he has the gall to compare Southaven to Memphis? How about comparing Southaven to suburbs of Nashville? Or Charlotte? Or pick any other city. No comparison; Southaven is a joke compared to them. And let’s look at the region around Memphis, once you get past the burbs. Probably one of the least educated and most poverty stricken and crappiest regions around any major city anywhere. Cotton fields and soybeans. Woo-hoo! How exciting. Full of uneducated boobs with low incomes and high obesity. The whole REGION is the problem, not just Memphis. Morons. You’re like the frog in the slow-boiling pot, by the time you idiots figure out you’re being cooked, it’s too late.

  2. Anonymous says:
    July 18, 2012 at 11:12 am

    Out in God’s country, people are smarter, richer, and happier.

    You FINALLY got it, huh?

  3. Finegold Hasava says:
    July 18, 2012 at 2:01 pm

    Anon.11:12 am

    No, the halfwits out there just think they’re smarter, richer, etc.

  4. nah says:
    July 22, 2012 at 6:13 pm

    They generally just want nothing to do with you. They are not angry at Memphis officials, frankly most could care less until you try to annex our schools or merge the county. Then they care.

    I am constantly perplexed at why ‘you folks’ always talk about the suburbs. It is like some sick adolescent fixation. We don’t want to go on another date with you. Quit calling us, quit showing up at our work. Stop asking our friends about us. We will give you a call if we want a date.

  5. frank says:
    July 22, 2012 at 8:22 pm

    I live in the suburbs and I agree 100% with everything here. The feeling that we know best, that we can make fun of city mayors and councilmen because they’re not as brilliant as we are, and there’s always the them and us, black and white that drives so much of what happens out here. Municipal schools are just the latest example.

  6. Anonymous says:
    July 23, 2012 at 10:30 am

    No one in the rest of the state wants a date with Memphis OR Shelby County or any suburb around it. That’s what ALL of you don’t get. The rest of us in Tennessee are sick of you people, period. Get the hell out of our state. All of you. Solve your own problems and quit running to us to play nursemaid and referee to all of your disfunction.

  7. Anonymous says:
    July 23, 2012 at 12:51 pm

    The ignorance of a couple of comments is proof of a number of points you make in your article. One non-sense comment above even likens the county charter issue as a one-sided love affair with Memphis on the losing side. A better analogy would be charter supporters in the city and county (Fred Smith included) trying to clean-up the half-retarded booger-eating reprobate of a county for a trip to the prom. The charter is about moving the Memphis metro forward and making it more economically competetive and provide more jobs and opportunities for the metropolitan community. But there is the rub. How can you help people when they can’t help themselves? Many non-Memphis residents cross the city limits for work and then thumb their nose at the city as they commute back home. They slam Memphis on the weekends, at the water cooler and on the Commercial Appeal comment threads. They bristle at a conversation about race race is in part what put them where they live and gutted urban communities. What county residents don’t realize is that by propogating the negativity and refusing to cooperate, they are really just $h****** where they eat. And they also don’t realize how pathetic all of this is to anyone outside of the Memphis metro. But to understand that, they’d first need to comprehend what metro even means. Maybe that would be a first place to start.

Kidnapped Women, A Bill Day Cartoon

by Bill Day. Memphian Bill Day is two-time winner of the RFK Journalism Award in Cartooning. His cartoons are syndicated internationally by Cagle Cartoons. Cartoons Archive →

Photograph by Amie Vanderford

More Images

This ongoing series of photographs is intended to show the daily lives of these single mothers in order to invoke recognition of their similarities to all mothers, along with understanding and empathy from the viewer of the strengths that these single mothers possess within the challenging situations they face. My hope is that newfound empathy with these mothers’ lives will give people some pause before they condemn single mothers when discussing issues such as welfare and other politically charged hot buttons.

  • Subscribe to Posts via Email

    You can get Smart City Memphis posts right in your e-mail box. Just sign up below to begin receiving them.


     

  • RSS

    • Weaving people back into the urban fabric

    • How clean is the air we breathe in cities?

    • Friday Fun: Self-driving automobile + Bus + Taxi = Otobuxi

    • Q&A with Hernan Navarro: Lima’s El Metropolitano BRT

    • Should the speed limit on arterial roads increase?

    • Promoting ridesharing for the daily commute in Mumbai

  • RSS

    • New Ventilation System Keeps Buildings Fresh But Warm

    • Eight Guidelines to Keep Creativity at the Heart of Cities

    • Infographic: Cities Embracing the Green Revolution

    • The Economic and Educational Value of Retrofitting Schools

    • Greening Cities with Better Bike Lanes

    • Texas and Bangladesh: Tragedies of Placeless Economics

  • RSS

    • The New Geography of Teen Mothers

    • New York Street Vendors Displaced by Bike-Share Want Their Voices Heard

    • Visualizing the Impact of Mega-Storms on Transit

    • Is Beirut's Reputation for LGBT Tolerance a Myth?

    • New Satellite-Eye Views of the Deadly Oklahoma Tornado

    • Airline Perk of the Day: A Book That Lasts Precisely the Length of Your Flight

  • Search Posts

  • About Smart City Memphis

    This is Smart City Consulting's blog and its purpose is to connect the dots and provide perspective on events, issues, and policies shaping Memphis and its future. Smart City Memphis was named one of the most intriguing blogs in the U.S. by the Pew Partnership for Civic Change, it was voted the best Memphis blog in About.com's Reader's Choice Awards, and The (Memphis) Commercial Appeal wrote: "Smart City Memphis provides some of the most well-thought-out thinking about Memphis' past, present, and future you'll find anywhere." Our blog's editor is Tom Jones, principal at Smart City Consulting and an editorial contributor at Memphis magazine, where he writes the monthly column, City Journal. Submit blog posts, ideas, suggestions, and emails to tjones@smartcityconsulting.com.
  • Archives

    • May 2013 (21)
    • April 2013 (34)
    • March 2013 (27)
    • February 2013 (31)
    • January 2013 (30)
    • December 2012 (29)
    • November 2012 (31)
    • October 2012 (33)
    • September 2012 (29)
    • August 2012 (33)
    • July 2012 (26)
    • June 2012 (33)
    • May 2012 (33)
    • April 2012 (31)
    • March 2012 (37)
    • February 2012 (32)
    • January 2012 (35)
    • December 2011 (29)
    • November 2011 (30)
    • October 2011 (34)
    • September 2011 (33)
    • August 2011 (39)
    • July 2011 (36)
    • June 2011 (41)
    • May 2011 (36)
    • April 2011 (57)
    • March 2011 (39)
    • February 2011 (45)
    • January 2011 (56)
    • December 2010 (44)
    • November 2010 (30)
    • October 2010 (28)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (22)
    • July 2010 (23)
    • June 2010 (34)
    • May 2010 (28)
    • April 2010 (32)
    • March 2010 (35)
    • February 2010 (31)
    • January 2010 (43)
    • December 2009 (49)
    • November 2009 (17)
    • October 2009 (24)
    • September 2009 (23)
    • August 2009 (18)
    • July 2009 (22)
    • June 2009 (28)
    • May 2009 (23)
    • April 2009 (23)
    • March 2009 (26)
    • February 2009 (25)
    • January 2009 (36)
    • December 2008 (15)
    • November 2008 (22)
    • October 2008 (21)
    • September 2008 (25)
    • August 2008 (23)
    • July 2008 (32)
    • June 2008 (27)
    • May 2008 (35)
    • April 2008 (26)
    • March 2008 (25)
    • February 2008 (29)
    • January 2008 (33)
    • December 2007 (20)
    • November 2007 (19)
    • October 2007 (32)
    • September 2007 (25)
    • August 2007 (25)
    • July 2007 (26)
    • June 2007 (16)
    • May 2007 (21)
    • April 2007 (25)
    • March 2007 (18)
    • February 2007 (16)
    • January 2007 (17)
    • December 2006 (16)
    • November 2006 (14)
    • October 2006 (18)
    • September 2006 (21)
    • August 2006 (20)
    • July 2006 (20)
    • June 2006 (17)
    • May 2006 (12)
    • April 2006 (19)
    • March 2006 (20)
    • February 2006 (23)
    • January 2006 (16)
    • December 2005 (23)
    • November 2005 (21)
    • October 2005 (23)
    • September 2005 (19)
    • August 2005 (27)
    • July 2005 (23)
    • June 2005 (16)
    • 0 (2)
  • Categories

  • Contributors

    • Aaron Shafer
    • Andrew Trippel
    • Anthony Siracusa
    • Barry Chase
    • Brad Leon
    • Brian Stephens
    • CEOs for Cities
    • Charles Santo
    • Chris Sanders
    • Crosstown Collaborative
    • David Williams
    • Doug Imig
    • Elizabeth Alley
    • Elizabeth Lemmonds
    • Emily Trenholm
    • Eric Mathews
    • Gene Pearson
    • Gene Pearson and Louise Mercuro
    • George Lord
    • Greg Thompson
    • Gwyn Fisher
    • Janet Boscarino
    • Jim Strickland
    • Jimmie Covington
    • John Kirkscey
    • John Lawrence
    • Jonathan Flynt
    • Josh Whitehead
    • Julie Ellis
    • Kenya Bradshaw
    • Laura Adams
    • Leah Wells
    • Louise Mercuro, AICP
    • Lurene Cachola Kelley
    • Margot McNeeley
    • Mark James
    • Matt Farr
    • Matt Timberlake
    • Melissa Petersen
    • Natashia Gregoire
    • Ray Brown
    • Rev. Steve Montgomery
    • Robert Bain
    • SCM
    • Scott L. Newstok
    • Smart City Memphis
    • Smart City Radio
    • Steve Bares
    • Steve Lockwood
    • Susan Adler Thorp
    • Tom Jones
    • Tomeka Hart
    • Tommy Pacello
    • Women Unite
    • Zach Hoyt

© 20111-2013 Smart City Memphis. All rights reserved.

  • Register
  • Log in
  • RSS
  • Smart City Radio
  • Smart City Consulting