Smart City Memphis
 

Sign up or Login

Getting The Grammar Right

by SCM (RSS) | January 12th, 2012 1:57pm CDT

Tweet

From PR Daily:

My mother was from the East Coast, and she had a bevy of funny expressions. A short person was “two jam-pots high.” No one was ever just big; he or she was “great big huge.” But my favorite expression was, “Wouldn’t that just rot your socks?” It expressed good-humored annoyance with something or someone (often me!).

One of the things that rots my socks is the misuse of the English language. I’m no grammar zealot and I’ve been known to make my own mistakes (usually the result of poor proofreading), but at least I care about words. While it’s true that corporate communicators need to aim at colloquial language—we don’t want to be so colloquial that we assault our readers’ eyes with errors. Here are 25 of the most common ones you should watch out for:

Spelling

1. Writing “then” when you mean “than.” The first is a description of time—“I wrote the sales letter and then I wrote the advertisement”—while the other is used when making a comparison—“I am more sick of this picky client than you are!”

2. Misspelling “bated breath.” If you write baited breath, everyone will suspect fishing is your favorite hobby. The word should be spelled bated, which comes from abated, meaning held.

3. Using “accidently” instead of “accidentally.” There are quite a few words with -ally suffixes (“incidentally”), and these should not be confused with words having -ly suffixes (“independently”). Accidently makes it into some dictionaries but it’s regarded as a variant. It’s wise to avoid variants if you can, because some people will become more concerned about your spelling than what you’re selling.

4. Writing that something has “peaked your interest.” We’re not talking mountain climbing here. The correct word is piqued.

5. Confusing “racked” with “wracked.” If you are racked with nerves, you are feeling as if you are being stretched on the torture device, the rack. You rack your brain when you try to write difficult stories. Wrack, on the other hand, has to do with ruinous accidents. With luck, this won’t apply to your writing, but it might just apply to the stock market, which has been wracked by recession.

Word usage

6. Confusing “into” with “in to.” The word into is a preposition (a linking word) that answers the question, where? “Donna walked into her office before noticing her CEO was sitting at her desk.” Note that the “where” needn’t always be a physical place—Donna could also “go into business” or “go into graduate school.” But, on those occasions where in and to just happen to end up beside each other, they must remain separate words. For example, “Peter walked in to see his supervisor.”

7. Misusing “literally.” If your boss said, “I literally felt like firing the entire department,” would you think she really meant that? No! She meant it metaphorically. Small comfort, I know, but help her retain at least a few well-trained staff by stopping her from ever using literally unless it’s the actual (literal) truth.

8. Confusing “edition” with “addition.” I know both words sound alike, but they mean totally different things. An edition is the form in which a text (usually a book) is printed, an issue of a newspaper or magazine or a version of something that’s a little different from the ordinary (for example, an experimental edition of a play). Addition, on the other hand, is what you do when you add up numbers (1 + 1 = 2), when there is an increase (“there was an addition to our taxes this year”) or when you expand your house (“the addition of the deck increased the value of our house significantly”).

9. Saying you made a 360-degree turn, when you changed direction. I’ve had many (otherwise bright) bosses say they made a 360-degree turn when they meant that they turned around completely. But think about it: If you turn around so that you’re facing in the opposite direction, you’ve actually made a 180-degree turn.

10. Being redundant. Repeat after me: PIN stands for personal identification number. Therefore, you cannot say PIN number without being redundant. Similarly, CD-ROM stands for “compact disc, read-only memory,” DVD stands for digital video disc or digital versatile disc and ATM stands for automated teller machine. Thus, don’t repeat the word disc or machine. Furthermore, never describe your “favorite pet peeve.” Stick with “pet peeve” alone. “Personal favorite” is another noxious phrase. Can you ever imagine an impersonal favorite?

11. Failing to understand the difference between “hone” and “home.” To hone is to sharpen. You can hone a point but you home in on a target. This is why they don’t call those birds “honing pigeons!”

12. Saying something is a “mute point” instead of “moot.” Moot means open to discussion or debatable. Mute means silent. Much as we all might appreciate more mute points, they’re not only ineffective, they’re also incorrect.

13. Using “centered around.” Think about that phrase for a second. How could anything be centered around something else? The correct phrase is “centered on.”

14. The inability to distinguish between “e.g.” and “i.e.” The abbreviation e.g. is Latin for “exempli gratia” meaning “for example”. The abbreviation i.e., on the other hand, stands for the Latin “id est” meaning “that is to say.” So, you might write, “We like vegetables—e.g., broccoli, green beans and cauliflower.” Or you might write, “We like all vegetables—i.e., we’re healthy eaters.”

15. Misusing the word “penultimate.” This word means second to last: November is the penultimate month of the year. It does not mean “super-ultimate” (e.g., “He’s the penultimate father” is incorrect).

16. Using “irregardless.” While irregardless does appear in some dictionaries, it’s always listed as “non-standard.” That’s because it’s meaningless. The “ir” cancels out the “regardless.” Stick with plain old regardless.

17. Confusing “flush it out” with “flesh it out.” To flesh out an idea is to give it substance. But if you’re trying to drive a criminal, an injustice or bad behavior out into the open, you want to flush it out.

Grammar

18. Using“could of,” “would of,” “should of.” These are all 100 percent wrong, born of our sloppy speaking styles—could’ve, would’ve, should’ve. What you want to write is could have, would have, should have. We all coulda, woulda, shoulda become better at grammar.

19. Using “me and somebody.” I tell my children that it’s common courtesy to put the other person first. Thus you should always say, “Fred and I went to the gym together,” or “Suzie and I saw that movie.”

20. Using “that” instead of “who” (and vice versa). If you’re writing about people, always use who. If a company president says, “employees that are affected by layoffs will be greatly missed,” no one is likely to believe him because he’s treating them as objects by using the word that.

21. Using “they” when referring to a business. “Starbucks said they would give everyone a free latte today.” Although this might sound right, the correct sentence is: “Starbucks said it would give everyone a free latte today.” And if that grates on your ears, then rewrite the sentence to avoid the problem: “Starbucks is offering everyone a free latte today.”

Style

22. Using “orient” and “orientate” in the same piece of text. Both words are correct, meaning to determine one’s position with reference to another point or to familiarize (someone) with new surroundings or circumstances. That said, the latter choice is British and widely considered “incorrect” in the U.S. Bottom line: If you spell theater (rather than theatre), you should also use orient.

23. Using “toward” and “towards” interchangeably. Both words are correct, but again, the latter is British and the former is American. Which you choose depends on your audience. And whatever you do, be consistent.

Apostrophes

24. Using “it’s” when you mean “its.” This is a mistake I see every day—whether on the Web or in print. The rule is so breathtakingly simple that everyone should learn it’s stands for it is. The possessive version, “The dog chewed on its bone,” somehow prompts people to throw in an errant apostrophe. Whenever I see it’s, I always reread the sentence to ensure the correct meaning is it is. And when I see its, I reread the sentence to ensure it doesn’t mean it is.

25. Using a random apostrophe. Is there a worse mistake than “The photo’s are for sale at 50 percent off”? Remember, apostrophes are used only in two cases: to signify a letter has been omitted (in “it’s” it represents the missing “i” from the word “is”) and to signify possession (“The dog’s dish of water was spilled by the anxious owner”).

Don’t use random apostrophes—or make any of these other mistakes—or you’ll be rotting your readers’ socks.

A former daily newspaper editor, Daphne Gray-Grant is a writing and editing coach and the author of 8½ Steps to Writing Faster, Better. She offers a free weekly newsletter on her Web site, the Publication Coach.This story first appeared on Ragan.com.

Tags: Uncategorized

Categories: Uncategorized

Comments RSS Feed

One Comment

  1. Mark says:
    January 13, 2012 at 11:09 am

    The source of my irritation is the all-too-common use of “I could care less.” Do people not give any thought to exactly what it is that they are saying? If you could “care less,” doesn’t that mean that you care about it?

Wire Tapping Gator, A Bill Day Cartoon

by Bill Day. Memphian Bill Day is two-time winner of the RFK Journalism Award in Cartooning. His cartoons are syndicated internationally by Cagle Cartoons. Cartoons Archive →

Photograph by Amie Vanderford

More Images

This ongoing series of photographs is intended to show the daily lives of these single mothers in order to invoke recognition of their similarities to all mothers, along with understanding and empathy from the viewer of the strengths that these single mothers possess within the challenging situations they face. My hope is that newfound empathy with these mothers’ lives will give people some pause before they condemn single mothers when discussing issues such as welfare and other politically charged hot buttons.

  • Subscribe to Posts via Email

    You can get Smart City Memphis posts right in your e-mail box. Just sign up below to begin receiving them.


     

  • RSS

    • Safety on two wheels? There’s an app for that

    • “The car is the cigarette of the future”

    • Friday Fun: Changing the way we think about urban design for our aging population

    • 3 things you did not know about sustainable transport in Iran

    • Nominate your city for the 2014 Sustainable Transport Award

    • The life and death of urban highways

  • RSS

    • Brazil’s Bus Battle: The Fight Against Fare Hikes

    • Twitter Taxi Drivers: Technology Transformed into Trust

    • Transforming Cities with Transit: Our Next #citytalk

    • Informal Cities and the Transformation of Latin America

    • Ten Sustainable Ideas to Transform Cities

    • Building Communities by Swapping Vegetables

  • RSS

    • Typo of the Day: The Wrong Year Got Etched on the Gravestone of Former NYC Mayor Ed Koch

    • America's Landlords Are Less Likely to Rent to Gay Couples

    • Where New York's Old Telephone Booths Go to Die

    • Should You Commute by Citi Bike? One Man's Hilariously Detailed Analysis

    • Seriously, We Have to Stop Giving Away Free Parking to the Disabled

    • Brazilians Spend as Much as 26 Percent of Their Income to Ride the Bus

  • Search Posts

  • About Smart City Memphis

    This is Smart City Consulting's blog and its purpose is to connect the dots and provide perspective on events, issues, and policies shaping Memphis and its future. Smart City Memphis was named one of the most intriguing blogs in the U.S. by the Pew Partnership for Civic Change, it was voted the best Memphis blog in About.com's Reader's Choice Awards, and The (Memphis) Commercial Appeal wrote: "Smart City Memphis provides some of the most well-thought-out thinking about Memphis' past, present, and future you'll find anywhere." If you have questions, submissions, or ideas for posts, please email tjones@smartcityconsulting.com.
  • Archives

    • June 2013 (23)
    • May 2013 (31)
    • April 2013 (34)
    • March 2013 (27)
    • February 2013 (31)
    • January 2013 (30)
    • December 2012 (29)
    • November 2012 (31)
    • October 2012 (33)
    • September 2012 (29)
    • August 2012 (33)
    • July 2012 (26)
    • June 2012 (33)
    • May 2012 (33)
    • April 2012 (31)
    • March 2012 (37)
    • February 2012 (32)
    • January 2012 (35)
    • December 2011 (29)
    • November 2011 (30)
    • October 2011 (34)
    • September 2011 (33)
    • August 2011 (39)
    • July 2011 (36)
    • June 2011 (41)
    • May 2011 (36)
    • April 2011 (57)
    • March 2011 (39)
    • February 2011 (45)
    • January 2011 (56)
    • December 2010 (44)
    • November 2010 (30)
    • October 2010 (28)
    • September 2010 (24)
    • August 2010 (22)
    • July 2010 (23)
    • June 2010 (34)
    • May 2010 (28)
    • April 2010 (32)
    • March 2010 (35)
    • February 2010 (31)
    • January 2010 (43)
    • December 2009 (49)
    • November 2009 (17)
    • October 2009 (24)
    • September 2009 (23)
    • August 2009 (18)
    • July 2009 (22)
    • June 2009 (28)
    • May 2009 (23)
    • April 2009 (23)
    • March 2009 (26)
    • February 2009 (25)
    • January 2009 (36)
    • December 2008 (15)
    • November 2008 (22)
    • October 2008 (21)
    • September 2008 (25)
    • August 2008 (23)
    • July 2008 (32)
    • June 2008 (27)
    • May 2008 (35)
    • April 2008 (26)
    • March 2008 (25)
    • February 2008 (29)
    • January 2008 (33)
    • December 2007 (20)
    • November 2007 (19)
    • October 2007 (32)
    • September 2007 (25)
    • August 2007 (25)
    • July 2007 (26)
    • June 2007 (16)
    • May 2007 (21)
    • April 2007 (25)
    • March 2007 (18)
    • February 2007 (16)
    • January 2007 (17)
    • December 2006 (16)
    • November 2006 (14)
    • October 2006 (18)
    • September 2006 (21)
    • August 2006 (20)
    • July 2006 (20)
    • June 2006 (17)
    • May 2006 (12)
    • April 2006 (19)
    • March 2006 (20)
    • February 2006 (23)
    • January 2006 (16)
    • December 2005 (23)
    • November 2005 (21)
    • October 2005 (23)
    • September 2005 (19)
    • August 2005 (27)
    • July 2005 (23)
    • June 2005 (16)
    • 0 (2)
  • Categories

  • Contributors

    • Aaron Shafer
    • Andrew Trippel
    • Anthony Siracusa
    • Barry Chase
    • Brad Leon
    • Brian Stephens
    • CEOs for Cities
    • Charles Santo
    • Chris Sanders
    • Crosstown Collaborative
    • David Williams
    • Doug Imig
    • Elizabeth Alley
    • Elizabeth Lemmonds
    • Emily Trenholm
    • Eric Mathews
    • Gene Pearson
    • Gene Pearson and Louise Mercuro
    • George Lord
    • Greg Thompson
    • Gwyn Fisher
    • Janet Boscarino
    • Jim Strickland
    • Jimmie Covington
    • John Kirkscey
    • John Lawrence
    • Jonathan Flynt
    • Josh Whitehead
    • Julie Ellis
    • Kenya Bradshaw
    • Laura Adams
    • Leah Wells
    • Louise Mercuro, AICP
    • Lurene Cachola Kelley
    • Margot McNeeley
    • Mark James
    • Matt Farr
    • Matt Timberlake
    • Melissa Petersen
    • Natashia Gregoire
    • Pastor DeAndre Brown
    • Ray Brown
    • Rev. Steve Montgomery
    • Robert Bain
    • SCM
    • Scott L. Newstok
    • Smart City Memphis
    • Smart City Radio
    • Steve Bares
    • Steve Lockwood
    • Susan Adler Thorp
    • Tom Jones
    • Tomeka Hart
    • Tommy Pacello
    • Women Unite
    • Zach Hoyt

© 20111-2013 Smart City Memphis. All rights reserved.

  • Register
  • Log in
  • RSS
  • Smart City Radio
  • Smart City Consulting